The Process

AI-Powered Interview Prep

How I used Claude to build a structured interview preparation system — from candidate profiling to company-specific cheat sheets. A 4-phase pipeline where each step's output feeds the next.

Overview Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Phase 4 Tools
Structured context beats raw intelligence
Most engineers approach interview prep the same way: review their resume, practice LeetCode, Google some behavioral questions. The problem isn't effort — it's structure. You get generic preparation for specific situations.

I took a different approach: a 4-phase pipeline where each step's output feeds the next, building compound context that makes every downstream artifact sharper.

Pipeline Architecture
📄 Resume
📋 Tech Docs
📂 Project READMEs
1 Candidate Profiling
Archetype 2-3 Angles Strength/Gap Analysis
archetype + angles + gaps ↓
2 Market Research
Deep Research Interview Formats Stack Overlap
20+ targets + formats ↓
3 General Study Guide
Variant Scripts Deep Dives Interactive Prep Page
reusable prep artifacts ↓
4 Per-Listing Analysis
Fit Map Gap Framing Company-Specific Tips
🎯 Interview Ready

The core insight

An AI with your resume can give you generic interview advice. An AI with your resume, technical documentation, candidate profile, market research, and gap analysis can give you a prepared answer for the exact question a specific company is likely to ask about the exact gap in your profile for their exact role.

The compound context is the product. Each phase builds on the last.

Candidate Profiling
Before you can prepare for interviews, you need to understand what you're selling. Most engineers skip this and jump to "help me prep" — which is why they get generic advice.
1 Feed everything you have
Resume, technical references, architecture decision records, project docs, design docs. The more context, the sharper the output. I provided ~170 pages of technical references across four platforms. The technical docs were the highest-signal input — they contained architecture decisions, performance benchmarks, and tradeoff discussions that a resume can't capture.
1 Identify your archetype
Not your title — the pattern of how you work. Mine came back as "Builder" — the engineer who gets dropped into a situation where something needs to exist and doesn't, then ships it end-to-end. That pattern held across both companies. It's a more useful framing than "Senior Platform Engineer" because it tells a story about how I operate, not just what my title was.
1 Define 2-3 angles
Different ways to frame the same experience depending on who you're talking to.
AngleHeadlineBest For
Security Platform"I build security infrastructure — edge sensors, fleet management, threat intelligence"WAF/AppSec, security startups, detection engineering
Platform / DevEx"I treat infrastructure as a product — build systems, developer tooling, self-service platforms"DevTools, IDP, observability, platform teams
SRE / Infrastructure"I find the bottleneck, build the system that removes it, then hand it off"Infrastructure, reliability, cloud platforms
Output
Archetype identification
Output
2-3 positioning angles
Output
Strength/gap analysis with gap framings
Market Research
Identify target companies where your profile has a genuine competitive advantage — not just companies that are hiring, but companies whose interview process and culture reward what you specifically bring.
2 Two research passes
Pass 1: Builder-friendly interviews. Companies with take-home assessments, paid work trials, portfolio reviews. If your strength is demonstrable output, optimize for formats that let you demonstrate it.

Pass 2: Stack and domain overlap. Companies where your specific technical experience maps directly to their product or infrastructure.
2 Per-company intelligence
For each target: specific open roles, documented interview process, AI culture signals, stack overlap analysis, competitive advantage narrative, compensation range, and application tips specific to their process. The research identified 20+ targets ranked by signal convergence — not just "who's hiring" but "where does my profile win."
Output
20+ ranked target companies
Output
Interview format analysis per company
Output
Competitive advantage narratives
General Study Guide
Build a reusable preparation artifact — something you can open 10 minutes before any interview and quickly navigate to the relevant talking points. This is the 80% that's company-agnostic.
3 Variant scripts, not single answers
"Tell me about yourself" has three versions — Platform, Security, and Builder — each leading with different experience and tuned to different company types. You pick the variant based on who you're talking to. Each script is annotated with a "Best for" callout naming specific companies from the research.
3 Navigable under pressure
Built as an interactive web page — grid of clickable tiles, floating header nav, modal system, keyboard shortcuts. Click a tile, get the modal with your talking points, arrow-key to the next section. 25+ sections covering openers, project deep dives, behavioral variants, and a key numbers reference. Designed for the literal moment you're sitting in a waiting room.
Grid Layout Modal System Variant Tabs Keyboard Nav Floating Header
Output
Interactive study guide (HTML)
Output
Variant scripts per angle × question
Output
Project deep dives + key numbers
Per-Listing Analysis
For each specific job listing, produce a targeted analysis: how your profile maps to their requirements, where you're strong, where you're thin, and how to talk about the thin spots. The 20% that's company-specific, but the highest-signal 20%.
4 Fit map
Map each stated requirement to your actual experience. For each: the requirement, your relevant evidence, fit level (Strong / Partial / Gap), and if it's a gap — a prepared framing that's honest but redirects to adjacent strength. "You don't have Go, here's how to handle it" is more useful than pretending the gap doesn't exist.
4 Interview tips + company hooks
Likely questions based on the gaps in your profile for this specific role. Interview tips tailored to their known process — take-home strategy, pair programming approach, system design framing. Company hooks — specific things to mention that show you've done homework on this company. Not "I like your mission." Specific technical decisions they've made that you have an informed opinion on.
Output
Fit map with gap framings
Output
Predicted hard questions + answers
Output
Company-specific cheat sheet
Tools & Meta
This entire system — the research, the study guide, the methodology, and this page — was built in a Claude Project over about a week of focused iteration.

Claude Projects

Persistent context across conversations. Resume, tech docs, research outputs all in one project. Each conversation builds on the accumulated context from previous phases.

Deep Research

Long-running research tasks with citation for Phase 2 market research. Two separate passes identifying 20+ target companies with interview format analysis.

Artifacts

Interactive study guide built and iterated in-conversation. HTML/CSS/JS generated, reviewed, and refined across multiple sessions. Grid layout, modals, variant tabs.

The Meta

Using AI to prepare for interviews about AI-augmented development. This page, the study guide, and the portfolio site are all artifacts of the same methodology being described.

Total time: ~1 week

Deliverables: an interactive study guide opened before every interview, a research doc with 20+ target companies, a repeatable process for per-company analysis, and this methodology writeup. The study guide has been the highest-ROI artifact — having the right variant of "tell me about yourself" pre-loaded based on whether you're talking to a security company or a platform company is the difference between a good first impression and a generic one.